Bringing ABA into Natural Contexts to Improve Outcomes for Individuals with ASD
This site offers tips, ideas, and strategies for bringing Applied Behavior Analysis into natural contexts to support children and adults with autism spectrum disorders and related disabilities.
Saturday, August 11, 2012
New Bringing ABA Website is Launched!!!!!
The content of this blog plus MUCH more on Bringing ABA into the natural environment can now be found on www.bringingaba.com.
Bringing ABA is a website dedicated to supporting professionals and caregivers with embedding the principles of applied behavior analysis (ABA) into the everyday lives of individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and other disabilities.
This new website provides a wealth of free reading materials and video clips on the topics of ABA, ASD, positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS), and inclusion for individuals with ASD and other disabilities. There is a database of hundreds of ABA lesson plans for teaching social skills, communication skills, academic skills, independent functioning skills, and positive behaviors across home, school, and community contexts. Special requests for lesson plans can be made if you do not find what you are looking for. Visit the professional development section to learn more about training and consultation opportunities for professionals and caregivers. Online continuing education (CE) courses for behavior analysts (BCBA’s and BCABA’s) are also available.
Click here for a short video that introduces you to the new website.
Friday, June 8, 2012
Positively ABA: The Relationship Between Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports and Applied Behavior Analysis
Positively ABA:
The Relationship Between Positive Behavior Interventions and
Supports and Applied Behavior Analysis
Jennifer Rodecki, M.Ed.
Over the
last two decades, research on positive behavior interventions and supports
(PBIS) has exploded. Schools across the nation are implementing school-wide
PBIS programs, and the results indicate a drastic decrease in problem behaviors
in students with and without disabilities (Cheney, et al., 2010; Sherrod,
Getch, & Ziomek-Daigle, 2009; Warren, et al., 2006). A school-wide PBIS
program is a three-tiered intervention that takes a proactive, systematic approach
to decreasing problem behaviors. PBIS focuses on determining the cause of the
behavior, teaching new behaviors, and positively reinforcing desired behaviors.
This makes PBIS similar to ABA, which also focuses to assess, change, respond
to, and monitor behaviors (Weiss, DelPizzo-Cheng, LaRue, & Sloman, 2009).
According
to Weiss et al. (2009), PBIS takes the principles of ABA and applies them to a
three-tiered program in which all students participate. Typically, ABA is
implemented to change the behavior of one individual. In a PBIS program, all
students participate in some interventions (tier-one), small groups of students
participate in more direct interventions (tier-two), and individual students
participate in personalized behavior modification programs (tier-three).
In
addition to having a school-wide PBIS program, teachers can implement a PBIS
approach into their classrooms to manipulate antecedents and consequences to
increase desired behaviors (Rodecki & Witzel, 2011). To do this, teachers must rely heavily
on the principles of behaviorism. Components of ABA such as stimulus control,
positive reinforcement, self-monitoring, and direct instruction are tools that
teachers can incorporate within their classroom to modify student behaviors.
Baer,
Wolf, and Risley (1968) defined the characteristics of ABA as applied,
behavioral, analytic, technological, systematic, effective, and having
generality. This means that implemented evidence-based interventions have a
direct, positive impact on the lives of the participants, which can be
generalized across contexts. PBIS uses a compilation of research-based
behavioral strategies to directly affect behaviors in all students, and
ultimately enhances educational opportunities (Rodecki & Witzel, 2011).
In
order for students with ASD and other disabilities to experience success in
inclusive classrooms, ABA and PBIS approaches must be implemented by the
classroom teacher. According to Leach (2010), students with ASD benefit from
receiving explicit instruction on rules and procedures, reinforcement when
engaging in expected behaviors, and positive redirection when not meeting those
expectations. These systematic procedures for behavioral interventions branch
from the foundations of ABA, and therefore, PBIS cannot sustain without the
principles of ABA. For effective inclusion, there must be a collaborative
approach among practitioners.
References
Picture: © Buzya_kalapkina | Stock Free Images & Dreamstime Stock Photos
Baer, D. M., Wolf, M.
M., & Risley, T. (1968). Current dimensions of applied behavior analysis.
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91 – 97.
Cheney, D., Lynass, L.,
Flower, A., Waugh, M., Iwaszuk, W., Mielenz, C., & Hawken, L. (2010). The
check, connect, and expect program: A targeted, tier 2 intervention in the
schoolwide positive behavior support model. Preventing School Failure, 54(3),
152-158.
Leach, D. (2010).
Brining ABA into your inclusive classroom: A guide to improving outcomes for
students with autism spectrum disorders. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks
Publishing Co.
Rodecki, J. N., & Witzel, B. S. (2011).
Positively decreasing disruption and discipline referrals. Focus on MiddleSchool, 42(2), 1-4. Retrieved May 29, 2012 from http://www.acei.org/images/stories/MiddleWinter11.pdf
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
Green Eggs and Ham Again???? Sure! Repeated Readings are Beneficial for Children with ASD
Does your child with ASD always want you to read the same
books over and over again? If so,
go ahead and keep reading them.
You may think that this is a perseveration that you have to stop, but
the truth is that young children benefit from repeated readings of children’s
literature. Below are the benefits
of repeated readings:
1. Hearing a
book over and over again builds language skills for children with ASD. As
the children get more and more familiar with the book, the language becomes
easier and easier to understand.
The first time a book is read to a child with autism, the language may
be very difficult to understand.
But each time the book is read the child has to work less and less at
understanding the language. When
parents read aloud to their children, it positively impacts the child’s
language development. For children
with ASD it is very important for them to hear the way sentences are
formed. With this repeated
exposure to books, many kids begin to recite the books on their own using complete
sentences. This will enhance their
ability to use language to generate sentences in the future.
2. Hearing a
book over and over again builds reading comprehension skills for children with
ASD.
Because children with ASD have communication impairments, reading
comprehension can be extremely difficult.
By exposing the children to repeated readings, the children have many
opportunities to gradually increase their comprehension of the text. During repeated readings, you can begin
by asking your child simple questions such as, “What’s this?” or “Where is the
cat?” With each additional reading
of the book you can make your questions more complex moving to literal
questions that assess the child’s comprehension (ex. “What did they eat for
dinner?”), and then to inferential questions (ex. “Why was the boy crying?”).
3. If a
child wants to read the same book over and over again, this is showing pleasure
in engaging in literacy activities. Why would we want to stop this???? Reading should be enjoyable for
children. Go ahead and re-read the
books your child loves as often as you’d like!
4. Reading
the same books over and over again provides multiple opportunities to build
your child’s social interaction and communication skills. You
can use your child’s motivation to address specific objectives during the
shared book reading activities. You can work on having your child use words or
complete sentences to request books. You can teach your child to make a choice of which book to
read. You can teach your child to
make initiations during the book sharing.
You can teach your child to invite a sibling to join the book sharing
activity. This list goes on and
on. Anytime a child has a natural
motivation for something, it should be nurtured and utilized for improving
social, communication, and academic skills.
The question you may be asking is, “Does this mean I shouldn’t
try to expose my child to new books?”
The answer is: Of course not!
The only way a book can become a favorite is by initial and repeated exposure. If your child is resistant to new
books, give your child a choice from two or three new books trying to match the
choices to your child’s interests.
You should also read the new book between two favorites: Read a favorite
book, a new book, and then another favorite book. It may take several exposures for a new book to become a
favorite. You can line the books
up so the child can see that the favorite books will still be read. While not every book will become a
favorite, I use the same rule I use for new foods: Read the book seven times to
the child. If it’s not a favorite
by then, move on to another book.
Thursday, May 31, 2012
ABA 101: An Overview of Applied Behavior Analysis
ABA 101: An Overview of Applied Behavior Analysis
Jennifer Rodecki, M.Ed.
Deb Leach, Ed.D., BCBA
The
science of behavior analysis studies how the environment can be manipulated to
change behaviors (Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007). The theories of applied behavior analysis (ABA) were
developed to improve human behavior through directly implementing the
principles of behaviorism (Axelrod, McElrath, & Wine, 2012). A major
component of ABA is operant conditioning. Operant conditioning is when a
behavior is altered because of the stimulus change that immediately followed
the behavior’s occurrence (Cooper, Heron, & Heward, 2007). Currently, research shows that
individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) show significant gains when
instructed using the principles of ABA (Axelrod, McElrath, & Wine, 2012).
The
first publication detailing the components of ABA was published in 1968 with
Baer, Wolf, and Risley’s paper entitled “Some Current Dimensions of Applied
Behavior Analysis.” This article outlined seven dimensions that must be met
when implementing single subject research using ABA. These dimensions were
later applied to intervention programs for individuals with ASD and other
disabilities. The table below provides a brief summary of each dimension
(Leach, 2010).
Dimension
|
Summary
|
Applied
|
The
interventions developed are meant to have a positive and significant impact
on the individual’s life
|
Behavioral
|
Behaviors,
goals, and objectives are clearly defined so that they can be measured and
observed by multiple people.
|
Analytic
|
The
intervention directly correlates with the behavior change, based on the
collected data.
|
Conceptual
|
All
strategies and interventions are research-based and emphasize principles of
behaviorism
|
Technological
|
Teaching
procedures are explicitly written so that they can be carried out the same
way by different people
|
Effective
|
There is
a significant positive change in the behavior that is directly correlated to
the intervention.
|
Generality
|
Learned
skills can be demonstrated across settings and contexts, and maintained over
time.
|
When
working with individuals with ASD, it is imperative that we follow these seven
dimensions as a framework for instruction and intervention. Over the last 30
years, a variety of intervention approaches for children with ASD have been
developed based on the principles of ABA. These approaches include: Discrete
Trial Teaching (DTT), Pivotal Response Training (PRT), Incidental Teaching
(IT), and Applied Verbal Behavior (AVB). These four approaches have become the
foundation of ABA interventions for individuals with ASD. Learning about the strategies utilized
in these approaches allows practitioners working with students with ASD to
design quality, individualized interventions that can be implemented across a variety
of natural contexts.
Discrete Trial Teaching (DTT) is an
instructional strategy that breaks skills into smaller tasks and uses direct
instruction to enable the student to master each skill (Leach, 2010). An A-B-C
(antecedent, behavior, consequence) format is used during DTT. This is where
the teacher provides the student with a direction or other prompting stimulus
(A), the student responds appropriately (B), and the teacher gives the student
immediate positive reinforcement based on that response (C). If the student
does not respond to the antecedent appropriately, then the teacher gives a
verbal, gestural, or physical prompt so that the student can successfully
engage in the desired behavior.
Another
application of ABA is Pivotal Response Training (PRT). PRT targets five main
areas: motivation, responsivity to multiple cues, self-management,
self-initiations, and empathy (Leach, 2010). By targeting these pivotal areas
in natural contexts, teachers can change behaviors in other areas. PRT has also
shown to enhance generalization of new skills in students with ASD and can be
implemented through peer-mediated interventions (Pierce & Schreibman,
1997).
Incidental
Teaching (IT) is an application of ABA that promotes social and communication
interactions in natural settings while increasing motivation and generalization
(Leach, 2010). This approach teaches skills to a child by taking advantage of the
child’s specific interests or an activity that he/she is engaged with (Steege,
Mace, Perry, & Longenecker, 2007). The child is given opportunities to communicate wants and
needs while the caregiver or teacher is following the child’s lead (Leach,
2010). Like PRT, IT can be implemented through peer-mediated interventions.
Applied
Verbal Behavior (AVB) is an ABA approach that teaches language acquisition by
combining B.F. Skinner’s classification of language with the A-B-C format of
DTT (Leach, 2010). The targeted skills of AVB include: requesting, labeling,
imitating, and engaging in conversations. In AVB, students are given
reinforcement through the social interactions with the interventionists. Unlike
DTT, AVB occurs in one-to-one settings and within the child’s natural
environments.
As
the number of students diagnosed with ASD continues to grow at a rapid rate, it
is vital that caregivers, special education teachers, general education
teachers, and related service providers have a clear understanding of effective
research-based teaching strategies. There is strong research support for using
ABA interventions with individuals with ASD across the lifespan. When creating
an individualized ABA program for students with ASD, there are a multitude of
research-based teaching strategies such as those used in DTT, PRT, IT, and AVB
that can be utilized to address the unique needs of each child. The purpose of ABA interventions is to
set meaningful goals, design behavioral interventions to address the goals,
implement the interventions across a variety of natural contexts, and monitor
progress to ensure the skills are mastered, maintained over time, and
generalized in meaningful ways.
Works Cited
Axelrod, S., McElrath,
K., & Wine, B. (2012). Applied behavior analysis: Autism and beyond. Behavioral
Interventions, 27(1),
1-15.
Cooper, J.O., Heron,
T.E., Heward, W.L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle
River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Leach, D. (2010). Brining
ABA into your inclusive classroom: A guide to improving outcomes for students
with autism spectrum disorders. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brooks Publishing Co.
Pierce, K. &
Schreibman, L. (1997). Multiple peer use of pivotal response training to
increase social behaviors of classmates with autism: results from trained and
untrained peers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30(1), 157-160.
Steege, M.W., Mace,
F.C., Perry, L., & Longenecker, H. (2007). Applied behavior analysis:
Beyond discrete trial teaching. Psychology in the Schools, 41(1), 91-99.
Friday, May 25, 2012
Wait! Don’t Prompt Just Yet…Try Modeling/Request Imitation First
Prompting/fading
procedures are used extremely often when implementing ABA interventions with
individuals with ASD. When used
correctly, and the fading procedures are systematic, this strategy is quite
effective. However, it should not
be the first plan of action in many instances. Here’s why:
Think
about how you learn most of the things you know. It can be through reading and through experiences. Many people say, “I need to see it first.” Well, we know that children with ASD
are visual learners. Don’t you
think it makes sense that they would need to see it first as well? Thus, instead of making a request and
then prompt if the child does not respond, first model the expectation. Immediately following the model, provide
an opportunity for the child to imitate the model. This strategy is called modeling/request imitation
(Buffington, Krantz, McClannahan, & Poulson, 1998). If you can show the
child exactly what you want him/her to do, you will be surprised how often the
child can imitate the response without any prompts. Of course, if the child does not imitate the model,
prompting/fading procedures can be used at that time.
Another
reason why it is important to use modeling/request imitation is to increase the
child’s independence. If the child
can see what is expected, and imitate the model without any prompts,
independence is achieved much quicker than using prompts and having to
systematically fade them out.
Using modeling/request imitation is a great way to prevent prompt
dependency.
One
more reason to use modeling/request imitation before prompting/fading
procedures is to build the child’s self-esteem. If the child can see what you want and imitate without any
prompts, the child is likely to have a sense of accomplishment and feel good
about his/her performance. Once
prompts have to be initiated, you are saying, “Let me help you.” Depending on
how those prompts are delivered, the child can quickly begin to feel like a
failure. I am not saying that
using prompting/fading procedures is bad because I use them all of the
time. I am saying it is best to
first try modeling/request imitation. Initiate prompting/fading procedures only
if the child cannot respond to the model.
Below are some examples for using modeling/request imitation:
1. Early
Childhood: A caregiver wants to teach a child how to use a
fork. The caregiver first models
sticking the fork into a piece of food, then takes the fork out, gives it to
the child and says, “Now, you try!”
The child takes the fork and attempts to stick it into the food. Although the fork didn’t go all the way
in, the caregiver positively reinforces the child with specific praise and
quickly puts the fork in the food and gives it to the child to eat. With each successive trial, the
caregiver models and offers an opportunity for the child to imitate. After just a few trials, the child is
able to independently stick a fork into the food.
2.
Elementary: A teacher wants to teach a child how to add with
regrouping. The teacher sits next
to the child and writes two of the same problem on a piece of paper. One problem is on the child’s side; the
other is on the teacher’s side.
The teacher first models adding the numbers in the ones column, and
provides an opportunity for the student to imitate that step with the same
problem. Next, the teacher models
how to add the tens column with the number that was carried over, and provides
an opportunity for the student to imitate that step as well using the same
problem. Several problems are done
this way until the student is able to complete the problem without any
modeling.
3.
Middle/High School: A teacher wants to teach a student how to measure
materials for a science experiment using measuring cups and measuring
spoons. The teacher decides to use
peer-mediated intervention by having a peer use modeling/request imitation to
show the child how to measure with the cups and the spoons. For each item that needs to be
measured, the peer first shows the child how to fill up the measuring
cup/spoon, then dumps it out and gives the student an opportunity to imitate
the model. The peer continues to
use modeling/request imitation until the student can measure independently
without the model.
4.
Community-Based Instruction:
An employer wants to teach an
individual how to file away folders in alphabetical order. The employer models how to do so,
removes the folder, and provides an opportunity of the individual to
imitate. This is repeated with
several different folders until the individuals can file alphabetically without
a model.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)